日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes

By Cui Shoufeng | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-02 06:54
Share
Share - WeChat

SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

Editor's Note: The parents of an 11-year-old boy, who was killed in a collision with a coach while riding one of Ofo's shared bikes in Shanghai in March, have sued the company and the coach driver, demanding 8.78 million yuan ($1.32 million) in compensation. They also want Ofo to replace its bike locks with smarter ones. Two experts share their views with China Daily's Cui Shoufeng. Excerpts follow:

Smarter locks cannot rule out accidents

Judging by the evidence available, the legal guardians of the 11-year-old, including his parents and school, should be primarily responsible for his death. Children of his age are deemed to have limited capacity for civil conduct and, hence, their civil actions should have the consent of or be ratified by their guardians. Besides, Chinese law prohibits children below 12 from riding bikes on public roads.

The coach driver's responsibility is comparatively less as the boy "stole" the bike by cracking the combination code to its lock and was riding on the wrong side of the road when the bus hit him.

The question then is: How much responsibility the bike-sharing company should shoulder?

The locks of many Ofo bikes are not difficult to open, because their four-digit combination code does not change after use and can be easily obtained. Perhaps that's why Ofo has been updating the old mechanical locks since March. The new, smart locks are harder to crack, but they have not yet been fitted to all Ofo bikes.

From the legal point of view, however, Ofo cannot be held responsible for the accident. And whether or not it has violated tort law should be decided by the cause of the boy's death. But if the locks of all Ofo bikes have design flaws and the boy cracked the combination code on one of them, Ofo should be held accountable.

Ofo might be exempted from blame, however, if it is established that the boy found the bike unlocked, because the violation of tort law consists of illegal acts and intentional mistakes. The company has moral and technological obligations, though, to update its products and pay compensation to the boy's parents. But accidents like this are not always foreseeable and cannot be avoided even after Ofo equips all its bikes with smarter locks.

Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Center at China University of Political Science and Law

1 2 Next   >>|
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕免费 | 日本国产在线视频 | 亚洲一区久久久 | 亚洲精品456| 特级黄色片 | 日韩久久久久久久久 | 日韩一级片免费看 | 91免费视频黄 | 综合五月婷婷 | 99在线精品视频免费观看20 | 久久久精品影院 | 亚洲黄业 | 欧美大片18| 99精品一区二区 | 成人中文字幕在线观看 | 免费手机av | 欧美在线一级 | 伊人成人在线视频 | av三级在线观看 | 久久亚洲天堂网 | 午夜国产福利视频 | 成人三级av| www.超碰在线观看 | 日韩久久一区二区 | 亚洲国产婷婷 | 亚洲天堂欧美 | 黄色福利在线观看 | 欧美黑人一级爽快片淫片高清 | 天堂精品视频 | 亚洲欧美在线视频 | 可以看av的网址 | 超碰777 | 亚洲波多野结衣 | 国产a免费 | 青草草在线视频 | 亚洲网址| 九色91在线| 中文天堂在线资源 | 欧美丰满一区二区免费视频 | 亚洲综合91| 日日舔夜夜摸 |