日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Property curbs working to potential

By Yang Zhiyong | Yang Zhiyong | Updated: 2018-01-22 06:53
Share
Share - WeChat
LI MIN / CHINA DAILY

Lanzhou, capital of Northwest China's Gansu province, has reportedly eased the property tightening policy in some of its districts despite local authorities' denial previously, raising public concerns that such measures could be eased nationwide.

If the authorities impose property tightening measures in areas where real estate transactions are not very high, the measures, instead of curbing housing prices, might have a negative impact on even genuine homebuyers as opposed to speculators. The Lanzhou authorities have eased the restrictions on housing purchase policy only in those districts where few people buy houses, not in the areas where the demand for property is high.

The restrictions were imposed to curb soaring housing prices. So they should be lifted after the rise in housing prices is curbed, or declines. In major cities where the housing demand still exceeds supply, the tightening policy continues to be in force.

Ensuring every household's demand for housing is met and people's livelihoods are improved are among the principal goals of the government. And since people's living conditions will improve in accordance with the increase in their incomes, the establishment of a multiple housing supply system would satisfy the demands of people of different income levels.

China is exploring a joint-property rights housing system and a developed rental housing market to meet the housing demand of the households that cannot afford to pay for commercial housing. Since housing is for living in, not speculation, it is not necessary for everyone, especially those with limited purchasing power, to buy commercial housing if joint-property rights housing can meet their residential need.

Given that incomes are increasing at a much slower pace than housing price rise, it doesn't make sense for everyone to purchase commercial housing just to enjoy total property rights. If the rental housing market is developed and enough houses are offered on lease, they can satisfy many people's residential need. As such, joint-property rights housing and rental housing could partly reduce people's demand for commercial housing, and thus help curb the soaring housing prices.

Of course, the real estate market should be regulated. But commercial housing should continue playing a major role in the housing market. Some people argue that China should take a page or two out of Singapore's housing system, which provides affordable housing including joint-property rights housing for a majority of its citizens, to streamline its housing market. But that would mean the government shouldering the responsibility for housing supply.

Instead, what we need is sufficient supply of affordable housing. In market economy, the market should play a crucial role in resource distribution, which means the market should decide housing supply. During special periods, however, the government could play a greater role in housing supply. For instance, when the housing price to income ratio is extremely unreasonable, the government should help meet a part of the housing demand.

A normal market, including the housing market, should use purchase-restriction policies as little as possible, because they restrict the market from playing its due role. After the basic residential demand is met, the market should be allowed to play a leading role in meeting the demands for better, even luxury, housing. And for the mid-to high-end housing demands, purchase restrictions are not only unnecessary; they could also distort the market.
Socialism with Chinese characteristics has stepped into a new era, and the principal contradiction has evolved to be that between "unbalanced and inadequate development and the people's ever-growing needs for a better life". The demand for mid-to high-end housing should be seen as a demand for a better life.

The housing market reform is vital to sustainable and healthy economic growth, but to achieve the essential goal of property tightening measures and to end housing speculation, the authorities should also expand housing supply.

The author is a research fellow at the National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美成人精品欧美一级乱黄 | av一二| 久久久久成人网 | 91亚洲国产成人精品一区二三 | 精品国产一区二区在线 | 午夜不卡影院 | 91欧美精品| 日本成人一区 | 欧美黑人性猛交 | 日韩乱码一区二区三区 | 都市激情自拍偷拍 | 一区二区在线免费观看视频 | 亚洲天堂欧美 | 欧美性生交xxxxx久久久缅北 | 国产传媒一区二区三区 | 精品成人在线 | 黄色ww| 国产精品一区二区三区免费 | 五月婷婷六月综合 | 日韩综合一区二区 | 哪里看毛片 | 黄色影视大全 | 欧美三级视频在线观看 | 成人欧美在线观看 | jlzzjlzzjlzz亚洲人 | 欧美成人精品一区二区三区在线看 | 视频国产精品 | 色丁香久久 | 日韩视频在线免费 | 成人在线观看一区 | 不卡av一区二区 | 午夜性刺激免费视频 | 久久精品福利 | 久久精品91| 日韩经典三级 | 久久7777 | 日韩免费毛片 | 永久免费看片在线观看 | 天天色官网| 在线免费观看你懂的 | 成人综合网址 |