日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Residents raise voice against 'overcharging' for parcel lockers

By Wang Yiqing | China Daily | Updated: 2020-05-13 07:30
Share
Share - WeChat
A resident collects her express parcels from a Hive Box self-serve package locker at a residential complex in Beijing on Feb 12. KUANG YANTAO/FOR CHINA DAILY

An open letter from Zhong Huan Garden, a residential community in Shanghai, on Sunday urging Hive Box to adjust its "unreasonable" charging policy for package lockers has gone viral online.

Hive Box, which provides temporary storage of express delivery packages, has invited public criticism in recent days for "overcharging" service users. The company announced recently that beginning in May, it will charge for delivery packages that remain stored in its express lockers for more than 12 hours. The public discontent is not because the company is charging for its services, but because it is overcharging.

Such lockers save an express deliveryman's time, as they can drop parcels into these lockers instead of going all the way to the recipients' doorsteps. Hive Box has been charging deliverymen for this efficient service for some time now. But the consumers, who would prefer the goods to be delivered at their doorstep, are loathe to use the locker service and, worse, even pay for it.

The Provisional Regulations for Express Delivery in China stipulates that recipients have the right to examine and receive their packages in person. The regulation on express locker service, effective since Oct 1, stipulates that deliverymen should seek the recipients' permission before dropping their parcels into the lockers.

Irked by Hive Box's overcharging policy, many resident communities have decided to stop using the service. Dongxinyuan residential community in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, informed Hive Box about its decision to not use its lockers unless it stops "illegally charging" them. They also sent a copy of their letter to the Hangzhou Consumers Association.

The letter from Zhong Huan Garden owners committee challenges the logic behind Hive Box's overcharging policy, be it from the perspective of consumers' rights, market rules or cost-benefit analysis.

On Tuesday, the committee also appealed to the authorities to launch an investigation against Hive Box for abusing its dominant market position.

The dispute over Hive Box's charges is a perfect example of consumers safeguarding their legal rights through public discussion and legal means. It is now up to the relevant authorities to investigate and safeguard consumers' rights.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 婷婷在线视频观看 | 中日韩一级黄色片 | 91在线看视频 | 91啪国产 | 国产精品色综合 | 婷婷婷色 | 纪美影视在线观看电视版使用方法 | 免费成人高清视频 | 午夜成人免费影院 | 美女黄色一级视频 | 青春草在线播放 | 午夜aaa| 免费黄色av | 最近2019中文字幕大全第二页 | 午夜影院a| 亚洲欧洲另类 | 亚洲最大的网站 | 日韩欧美成 | 欧美色图一区 | 国产精品日日夜夜 | 91精品国产91 | 亚洲天堂高清 | 欧美日韩在线国产 | 黄页av| 日韩黄色一区 | 日韩在线视频观看免费 | 日韩高清精品免费观看 | 久久九九国产 | 爱爱视频免费网站 | 国产欧美精品区一区二区三区 | 99视频在线观看免费 | 碰在线视频 | 99国产精品久久久久久久成人 | 免费中文字幕日韩 | 国产精品第 | 狠狠撸在线视频 | 色悠悠久久综合 | 91操碰| 伊人热久久 | 伊人啪啪 | 素人天堂|