Yue Su, an economist with The Economist Intelligence Unit, an economics research organization, said this is in marked contrast to the 4 trillion yuan financial stimulus－then believed to be the largest in economic history anywhere in the world－following the global financial crisis, much of it being focused on investment and infrastructure.

"It is different from the 2009 stimulus package in that boosting consumption is being prioritized and not investment. More policies focusing on boosting income and consumption are to be announced in the coming months," she said.

Louis Kuijs, Hong Kong-based head of Asia for consultancy Oxford Economics, said that while the measures represented a "meaningful" easing of policy, they demonstrated that there was no major appetite in Beijing for the scale of fiscal intervention of 11 years ago.

"It reflects the fact that a big stimulus package remains unpopular in Beijing amid concerns about excessive leverage and financial instability. The work report emphasizes instead stability and security," he said.

Magnus, who also is a research associate at The School of Oriental and African Studies in London and a leading expert on the Chinese economy, said he believed the fiscal expansion may prove bigger than many are anticipating.

He said the target of 3.6 percent fiscal deficit was already more than the long-standing, government-imposed limit of 3 percent.

"The fiscal stance is the load-bearing part of the government's program in the work report," he said.

"It will likely turn out much larger once accounting allows for the additional bond issuance by central and local governments, tax and fee cuts, and public sector liabilities not included in the central government's own finances."

A number of commentators detected a different tone in this year's work report compared with previous ones.

Stevens at Standard Bank said it reflected that the government clearly recognized the fact that it was difficult to make predictions in the middle of a pandemic.

"The tone was certainly different. There is a recognition that the ability to control outcomes is absent in 2020, and so the role of the government in the economy has been recast to doing the best they can, and focusing on only the most important items," he said.

Zhu, a veteran watcher of work reports, agreed there was a significant change.

"There was more focus on sustainability and quality outcomes. Chinese officials are more used to numerical targets, but now need to pay attention to quality-related key performance indicators, so it will be a challenge for them," he said.

Even with the absence of a growth target, there was a consensus among economists that the work report did provide a platform for recovery.

Kuijs at Oxford Economics said he believes China's year-on-year GDP growth could hit 4 percent in the second half after contracting 6.8 percent in the first quarter.

"We expect this macro stance to support the domestic recovery that we expect to continue despite the challenging external context," he said.

However, many believe these external factors may prove to be the biggest brake on China's recovery.

"Although China has fared better than many developed economies during this crisis, it is still reliant on external demand for its exports in the immediate short term. It will take much longer for domestic consumers to provide that support," said Zhu.