日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Newsmakers

WHO experts slam NYT report on China trip, say they were 'misquoted'

CGTN | Updated: 2021-02-14 19:09
Share
Share - WeChat

Scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) recently refuted claims in some US media articles that Chinese scientists refused to hand over important data during their trip to China to trace the origins of the COVID-19 virus.

Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times quoted the team as saying Chinese authorities refused to provide raw data - such as patient records. However, Peter Daszak, a zoologist and member of the WHO-China research team, said the team got access to critical data and felt trust and openness during the mission. He and another team member have criticized the New York Times for distorting the truth with their quotes "twisted" and misleading the public.

"This was NOT my experience on WHO mission. As lead of animal/environment working group I found trust and openness with my China counterparts. We DID get access to critical new data throughout," Daszak wrote on Twitter.

A screenshot of Peter Daszak's tweet.

He added that new data including environment and animal carcass testing, suppliers to Huanan seafood market, analyses of mortality in Hubei province, and early cases are "all in a report coming soon," just as WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Friday's press conference in Geneva that two reports on the WHO mission's findings are to be released soon and publicly.

Another expert on the panel echoed his comments. Replying to the thread, Thea Kolsen Fischer wrote, "This was NOT my experience either on the Epi-side. We DID build up a good relationship in the Chinese and International Epi-team! Allowing for heated arguments reflects a deep level of engagement in the room. Our quotes are intendedly twisted casting shadows over important scientific work."

Responding to Fisher, Daszak tweeted, "Hear! Hear! It's disappointing to spend time with journalists explaining key findings of our exhausting month-long work in China, to see our colleagues selectively misquoted to fit a narrative that was prescribed before the work began. Shame on you @nytimes."

Ilaria Capua, professor at the University of Florida, retweeted Daszak's, saying, "It actually can get even worse than disappointing."

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费激情视频网站 | 麻豆视频免费在线播放 | 欧美视频久久久 | 久久久国产免费 | av超碰 | 国产欧美一区二区三区在线观看视频 | 日韩在线色 | 亚洲精品高清视频 | 超碰一区二区 | 亚洲黄色精品 | 中文字幕在线播放不卡 | 日本精品久久久久久久 | 极品少妇av | av中文字幕免费在线观看 | 国产一级淫片a视频免费观看 | 91久久国产精品 | 国产精久久久久 | 成年人网站免费在线观看 | 国产成人精品视频在线 | 一级黄色片视频 | 最近中文字幕在线观看视频 | 黄色片子免费看 | 欧美福利一区二区 | 先锋资源久久 | 日韩一区二区三区免费 | 欧美视频亚洲 | 天堂综合网 | 噜噜噜噜色 | 成人黄色小视频在线观看 | 欧美视频一区二区在线 | 男人的天堂欧美 | 操碰97| 日韩欧美视频在线播放 | 在线成人亚洲 | 欧美视频一二三 | 日韩精品成人一区 | 天堂网在线资源 | 欧美午夜理伦三级在线观看 | 欧美日韩在线观看视频 | 午夜精品久久久久久久 | 日韩在线视频网 |