日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Why the G7's stance on HK is ludicrous

CGTN | Updated: 2021-03-15 10:18
Share
Share - WeChat
Violent protesters throw petrol bombs at the police line as protesters clash with riot police during protests at Tsuen Wan in Hong Kong, August 25, 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

On Saturday, the G7 group of advanced economies led by the UK released a joint statement on China improving the electoral system of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), accusing Beijing of moving to "eliminate dissenting voices and opinions in Hong Kong" and arguing that a "discussion of differing views, not silencing of them, is the way to secure the stability and prosperity of Hong Kong."

British Foreign Minister Dominic Rabb has since argued that the improvements violate the Sino-British Joint Declaration and is accusing China of "non-compliance" over the agreement.

The countries pointing fingers at Hong Kong might want to look at the situation in context, as opposed to through the lens of ideology. The idea that Hong Kong could somehow have been better off with the status quo persisting and in a permanent state of turmoil and chaos is ludicrous.

Second, some of the above-listed countries are responsible for actively deteriorating the special administrative region's security situation.

Third, the United Kingdom does not have a monopoly over the "interpretation" of the Sino-British Joint Declaration. This never meant that other countries get to stand over China as self-appointed guardians and treat it as a one-sided restraint instead of an agreement.

"One Country" is a prerequisite to the "One Country, Two Systems" principle. And as ruled in the Basic Law, the Chinese central government has all rights of national security over Hong Kong.

It is not something distinct or different. The Sino-British Joint Declaration and the guarantee of a "high degree of autonomy" never meant that the city ought to become free game and a playground for sedition, anti-state activities and foreign interests or that the central government has no right to stop this in the interest of the country as a whole.

Other than that, Hong Kong continues to be under a model of "Two Systems" in that it continues to have a separate administration in the fields of economics, healthcare, social policy, taxation, education and in many other aspects that are different from the Chinese mainland.

However, some things have been made to change precisely because certain aspects of the pre-national security law status quo became absolutely untenable. Yet, the response of the West is simply anticipating that China does nothing.

For an entire year, Hong Kong was struck with rioters who were openly backed by foreign powers, including American NGOs and politicians. They turned Hong Kong into a cauldron of chaos, instability and destruction.

Actions have to be taken by the authorities to restore stability to the city, end an endless cycle of violence and react against those who have sought to undermine the state entirely and serve foreign powers.

The rioters were the ones who forced these changes. The Chinese central government has a duty to protect the safety, stability and well-being of Hong Kong, and it has done so. Those who are advocating continued unrest are not acting in the sincere interests of the city or its people.

This is not about "eliminating dissent" or undermining the Basic Law. Just like in all the above countries, those who are "the opposition" must be loyal to the state and respect its rules accordingly.

The United Kingdom must respect China's sovereignty. It must cease acting in a parental and self-proclaimed "superior" role. The Sino-British Joint Declaration does not mean that the UK somehow has more say on the territory's future than the Chinese central government.

The British must respect that the imperial era is over and that its history in the territory was not righteous altruism but an act of aggression.

The model of "One Country, Two Systems," defined as a "high degree of autonomy," continues to otherwise exist in Hong Kong, in line with all the relevant laws and regulations. But no more can the city be utilized as a Trojan horse or an outpost to violate the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of China.

Hong Kong has its privileges, but it is also a part of the country. Under the new regulations, the HKSAR will now finally be able to return to its former prosperity and be free of chaos and mob rule.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩欧美第一区 | 91免费入口 | 亚洲t v| 少妇日韩| 亚洲va视频| av在线免费观看网址 | 毛片在线视频 | 日韩欧美在线观看一区二区 | 午夜久久久久久久久久影院 | 一区二区精品视频 | 四虎成人精品永久免费av九九 | av播放在线 | 久久窝窝| 久久久久久久久久久久久久 | www国产视频 | 天堂网成人 | 黄色大片在线免费观看 | 成人午夜视频在线 | 美女福利在线 | 国产精品一区二区三区免费视频 | 日韩av免费在线看 | 五月婷婷激情综合 | 免费黄色小视频网站 | 亚洲激情综合网 | 伊人手机视频 | 91tv国产成人福利 | 国产精品成人va在线观看 | 97人人干 | 国产福利免费在线观看 | 强开小嫩苞一区二区三区视频 | 国产一区二区三区在线 | 日韩香蕉网 | 亚洲天堂黄色 | 青青草视频在线看 | 日本视频一区二区 | 成人av片在线观看 | 天堂a在线 | 好吊妞这里只有精品 | 91亚洲精品久久久蜜桃网站 | 免费成人深夜夜视频 | 成人小视频在线 |