日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Comment

Jimmy Lai's 'champions' have own agenda

China Daily | Updated: 2025-12-17 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper's remarks on the conviction of Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, echoed by some other Western politicians and media outlets, once again reveal a familiar pattern: selective outrage, willful ignorance of facts and an attempt to politicize a judicial case that was handled strictly in accordance with the law.

Such reactions are not only irresponsible but also disrespectful to Hong Kong's judicial independence and the basic principles of the rule of law they themselves claim to uphold.

Lai's verdict is the result of a meticulous judicial process that spanned 156 days, examined a vast body of evidence and materialized in an 855-page judgment. The ruling was issued by a panel of three designated judges who carefully analyzed Lai's messages, records of meetings with foreign officials and extensive content published by Apple Daily and related entities.

Every major defense argument was addressed and refuted with detailed and professional reasoning. To issue condemnations almost at the same time on the very day the verdict was announced, as some Western critics did, makes it evident that the stance of these voices was predetermined, as they hadn't had time to study the judgment.

The core of the case is also being deliberately distorted in these baseless condemnations. The ruling is by no means an attack on journalism or press freedom, but a judgment on proven criminal acts. The court made clear that Lai was convicted not for expressing opinions, but for conspiring to collude with external forces, calling for foreign sanctions and publishing seditious materials with the intent of undermining national governance. The judges explicitly identified Lai as the "mastermind" behind these activities, noting that his actions went far beyond legitimate journalistic work.

Calls by some foreign politicians to portray Lai as a "defender of press freedom" ring hollow. Hong Kong is home to a diverse and vibrant media environment, and international media outlets continue to operate in the city. The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region does not target lawful reporting or commentary; it sets clear legal boundaries against acts that endanger national security. Similar boundaries exist in many countries, including those now casting stones. To pretend otherwise is either disingenuous or hypocritical.

Equally misleading are claims that the trial lacked due process or humane treatment. The court proceedings were open and transparent, with multiple foreign diplomats attending as observers. Lai, represented by lawyers, fully exercised his right to defense, and denied all the charges, as is his right. The court repeatedly confirmed that he received proper medical care during detention and that procedural safeguards were in place. Descriptions of the process as "unfair" conveniently ignore these documented facts.

Some critics have also questioned the absence of a jury, ignoring the fact that this arrangement is explicitly provided for under the law. The designated judge mechanism ensures professionalism and consistency in handling complex cases involving national security — again, a practice not uncommon internationally.

What is particularly troubling about the remarks from the UK foreign secretary and others is their open interference in Hong Kong's judicial affairs. The case is a matter for the Hong Kong SAR authorities, which bear a constitutional responsibility to safeguard national security under the "one country, two systems" framework.

These external forces should stop interfering in Hong Kong's judicial affairs and China's internal affairs, stop making the case for anti-China rioters bent on destabilizing Hong Kong, and stop going further down the wrong path.

Lai is by no means a "democracy fighter", but an individual who incited turmoil, glorified street violence, and openly lobbied foreign governments to sanction his own country. He is not a paragon of media ethics at all; his publications thrived on sensationalism, misinformation and social division. Nor is he a model "citizen", given his previous convictions for fraud and other offenses unrelated to national security.

Hong Kong's lawful handling of the Lai case demonstrates its zero-tolerance stance toward acts that endanger national security, while reaffirming the city's commitment to the rule of law. External forces should stop trying to exploit the case for political theater and instead respect the facts, the law and Hong Kong's judicial autonomy.

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 狠狠操91 | 久久久久久影视 | 粉嫩aⅴ一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区影院 | 亚洲精品乱码 | 日韩一区二区三区在线视频 | 久久精品视频中文字幕 | 69成人免费视频 | 亚洲五月综合 | 久久伊人在 | 亚洲国产精品视频在线观看 | 蜜桃成人在线观看 | 黄色资源网 | 亚洲美女激情视频 | 95看片淫黄大片一级 | 欧美国产另类 | 在线视频天堂 | 男女做爰猛烈动高潮大叫 | 成人午夜激情视频 | 国产精品二三区 | 97人人爱| 欧美乱淫 | 国产精品久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 澳门四虎影院 | 一区二区精品在线 | 国产男女裸体做爰爽爽 | 91视频麻豆 | av午夜精品| 国产精品视频久久久久 | 久久经典| www国产 | 韩国精品久久久 | 亚洲视频综合 | 在线天堂中文 | 欧美成人精品激情在线观看 | 国产让女高潮的av毛片 | 少妇性高潮视频 | 成人18视频免费69 | 最近免费中文字幕 | 国产日b视频 | 免费看黄色网 |