日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

US' seizure of Maduro has no legal basis

By Peiran Wang | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2026-01-04 10:23
Share
Share - WeChat
Photo taken on July 3, 2025 shows the US Capitol building in Washington, DC, the United States. [Photo/Xinhua]

The United States' seizure of Venezuela's President Nicolás Maduro marks a dramatic escalation in Washington's long-standing practice of using force in Latin America to apprehend foreign leaders under domestic criminal indictments. While extraordinary, this episode is not without precedent. In Dec 1989, the United States invaded Panama to arrest General Manuel Noriega on drug trafficking charges, forcibly transferring him to the United States for trial.

Both cases involve the unilateral apprehension of a sitting head of state accused by Washington of involvement in narcotics trafficking. They raise fundamental questions of international law, particularly concerning the legality of the use of force against a sovereign state and the scope of immunity traditionally accorded to heads of state. Examined through the lenses of the United Nations Charter and the doctrine of state immunity, the seizure of Maduro stands on legally indefensible ground.

Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter obliges all member states to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. A military operation to capture a foreign head of state on that state's own territory constitutes a clear violation of this core principal. In this respect, the United States' action represents a breach of Venezuela's sovereignty and of the Charter itself.

Washington has attempted to justify its conduct by invoking self-defense, claiming that Maduro's alleged "Cartel of the Suns" constitutes a threat to US national security and even characterizing cocaine trafficking as a form of "weapon of mass destruction". However, under Article 51 of the UN Charter, self-defense is permitted only in response to an actual armed attack. Venezuela has launched no such attack against the US. By expanding the concept of self-defense to encompass transnational drug trafficking, the US has stretched the doctrine beyond recognition.

The invocation of "weapons of mass destruction" further underscores the weakness of this argument. While widely used in political discourse, WMD is not a term authoritatively defined by treaty or customary international law. Recasting narcotics as WMD exploits this legal ambiguity and runs counter to the principle of good faith enshrined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

The US might argue that Maduro's alleged crimes — such as torture or crimes against humanity — trigger universal jurisdiction, allowing any state to arrest perpetrators regardless of nationality or location. International law does recognize universal jurisdiction for certain grave offenses. However, the modern legal framework for prosecuting such crimes is centered on the International Criminal Court.

Under the Rome Statute, the ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression — but only where states are unable or unwilling to prosecute. Crucially, the Court may exercise jurisdiction over a head of state only through established legal mechanisms, including referral by the UN Security Council under Article 13(b). Unilateral military abduction is not among them.

While the Rome Statute significantly erodes traditional head-of-state immunity —most notably through Article 27 — it does so within an institutional and legal framework designed to constrain power, not license its arbitrary use. The appropriate course for the United States, had it wished to pursue accountability, would have been to seek multilateral authorization through the Security Council and the ICC.

Instead, Washington has chosen to operate outside that system. The United States does not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC and formally withdrew from the Rome Statute framework in 2002. In recent years, it has gone further, imposing sanctions on ICC judges and prosecutors. This posture underscores a deeper contradiction: the United States insists on global accountability for others while exempting itself from the very institutions designed to deliver it.

Given the United States' veto power, meaningful consequences through the Security Council are virtually impossible. If such actions carry no international cost, the erosion of the UN-centered order will accelerate, inviting comparisons to the League of Nations in the 1930s — an institution rendered impotent by the unilateralism of its most powerful members.

Resorting to military invasion and the arrest of a sitting head of state, the United States has effectively abandoned the rules-based international order it long claimed to uphold, replacing it with a Hobbesian security culture characterized by coercion, zero-sum logic, and jungle law.

The author is a scholar at Brussels Research Institute on Development, Governance and Empowerment, through law, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久人人干 | 91国内视频| 99在线免费观看视频 | 日韩欧美高清在线 | 中文视频一区 | www中文在线 | 一区二区免费在线观看视频 | 亚洲精品久久久久国产 | 日韩一级片免费 | 国产区视频| 热久久精品 | 欧美视频中文字幕 | 欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区 | 亚洲欧美网站 | 欧美区在线观看 | 老牛影视av牛牛影视av | 成年人网站免费看 | 九九久久精品 | 亚洲自拍色 | 日本综合在线观看 | 六月婷婷在线 | 青青青视频在线免费观看 | 中文字幕88 | 六月激情网 | 好吊色欧美一区二区三区视频 | 成人看片在线 | 91福利影院 | 韩国一级淫一片免费放 | 亚洲天堂第一区 | 91精品国产吴梦梦 | 奇米第四色7777 | 久久免费国产 | 婷婷激情视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产一区 | 免费观看国产精品 | 狠狠操综合网 | 深夜福利一区二区 | 欧美成人免费一级人片100 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久日本蜜臀 | 午夜私人影院 | 骚鸭av|