The United Kingdom's public broadcaster, the BBC, is seeking the dismissal of United States President Donald Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against it.

The corporation will submit a motion to dismiss, in response to the president's lawsuit filed in the US state of Florida over the Panorama program, broadcast in the run-up to 2024 presidential election, that had spliced sections of a speech he made on Jan 6, 2021.

The segment suggested Trump urged supporters to attack the US Capitol building, but the edit removed his appeal to march "peacefully".

First reported by The Daily Telegraph newspaper on Nov 3, 2025, a year after broadcast, the revelations sparked a crisis at the BBC and prompted the resignations of director-general Tim Davie and BBC News chief executive Deborah Turness.

After the broadcaster apologized for the error but declined to make any compensation payment, Trump said he would pursue legal action, alleging defamation and breaches of Florida's deceptive and unfair trade practices law, claiming $5 billion in damages for each count.

Trump's complaint argues the edited speech, which was aired a week before the 2024 election, was intended to skew the vote and reflects the corporation's "leftist political agenda".

According to a motion filed on Monday, the BBC will argue the Florida court where Trump sued in November lacks "personal jurisdiction" over the corporation and that the venue is "improper".

The corporation's legal team contends the case should be dismissed because the documentary was neither created, produced, nor broadcast in Florida.

The motion also disputes Trump's assertion that the documentary was available in the US on the BritBox streaming service.

Trump's legal team stated on Nov 6: "Due to their salacious nature, the fabricated statements that were aired by the BBC have been widely disseminated throughout various digital mediums, which have reached tens of millions of people worldwide."

Filings indicate the BBC will argue the president did not "plausibly allege" it published the documentary with "actual malice", which is the standard public officials must meet in US defamation cases.

The BBC has requested the court "stay all other discovery", which means pausing the evidence-gathering phase until the motion is decided. If the case proceeds, a 2027 trial date has been proposed.

The broadcaster's lawyers expect Trump's legal team to demand very broad evidence in the case, going far beyond the specific clip, by trying to force it to hand over materials about its coverage of Trump over "the past decade or more".

Court papers filed by the BBC legal team argue the requested discovery would be "objectionable" because they are not narrowly tied to the alleged defamation.

According to The Daily Telegraph, legal analysts say Trump is unlikely to prevail in the defamation suit, as libel cases are harder to win in the US, where free-speech protections often prevail over competing claims.