日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion

Judicial justice must stand in full light of transparency

By Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2026-01-19 20:17
Share
Share - WeChat

In a development that is as perplexing as it is troubling, it recently came to light that China's official online portal for court judgments was quietly blurring or erasing the names of presiding judges from published rulings. This was not a minor technical glitch but what appeared to be a deliberate act — one that several legal experts have criticized as reducing solemn judicial decisions to something resembling "anonymous storytelling" or, in a more cynical reading, "legal fiction".

The Supreme People's Court, China's top court, to its credit, responded with commendable speed, denouncing the practice as "wholly inappropriate" and mandating its immediate correction. This episode strikes at the core of a foundational bargain between the courts and citizens: that true justice must not only be done, but must be unmistakably and undeniably seen to be done.

For years, China has consistently championed judicial transparency as the nonnegotiable cornerstone of legal reform. The celebrated launch of China Judgments Online, the official website established by the top court to disclose verdicts, was a bold pledge of openness, a promise to let the disinfecting power of sunlight flood the halls of justice. This was powerfully reinforced by live-trial broadcasts and the strategic publication of landmark cases — all orchestrated to build public trust through unwavering visibility.

The guiding principle is clear: transparency is the rule, the expectation. Secrecy is a narrowly defined, legally constrained exception reserved for protecting State secrets or shielding the vulnerable, such as victims of domestic abuse or minors.

Yet, the redaction of judges' names represents a self-inflicted wound to this very principle. A judge's signature on a ruling is not a trivial formality; it is a responsibility toward litigants and the public.

In the public eye, this act of anonymization can feel eerily like justice operating behind a veil, fostering suspicion where there should be trust, and inviting speculation about fragility where there should be an image of unshakable strength.

Contrast this with the exemplary handling of the disturbing case involving a man surnamed Mu, who mentally abused his ex-girlfriend. It was highlighted by the top court in November as a landmark ruling that confirms humiliation and degrading treatment of family members as forms of domestic violence.

In the release of that case, the top court balanced necessary privacy with crucial transparency. While protecting the identity of the victim, it laid bare brutal facts of psychological manipulation, the rigorous legal logic applied, and the broader societal message, clarifying that domestic violence "is not limited to physical abuse such as hitting", and that Mu's sustained humiliation and demeaning behavior toward a family member amounted to psychological violence.

That was transparency executed with confidence and purpose. The name-redaction scandal feels like just the opposite — a needless retreat into the shadows. The top court's corrective order is a vital first step. But this incident cannot be dismissed as a one-off flaw. It follows a pattern of awkward stumbling in the march toward transparency.

Ultimately, the authority of the judiciary is built day by day, verdict by verdict. That in turn builds public confidence. For justice to be truly credible, its architects must stand in the full glare of accountability. The promise of "open justice" demands nothing less than courageous, consistent, and complete visibility — starting with the clear, proud signature of every judge on every public judgment they write.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 激情五月色播五月 | 日韩视频在线观看免费 | 狠狠爱天天干 | 国产福利在线播放 | 日日日视频 | 九九热久久免费视频 | 日韩一区二区在线播放 | 国产一区二区三区免费视频 | 四虎在线免费观看 | 开心激情综合网 | 法国极品成人h版 | 九九九色 | 午夜色av| 日韩午夜免费 | 国产网站黄色 | 五月天黄色片 | 欧美不卡影院 | 91看片视频| 天天综合天天综合 | 欧美激情视频在线 | 波多野结衣亚洲一区二区 | 日本一本一道 | 国产日本一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩一二 | 欧美成人亚洲 | 成人激情在线视频 | 国产成人一区二区三区 | 久久久久视 | 午夜伦理福利 | 精品1区2区3区 | 国产一级二级三级在线观看 | 老司机午夜影院 | 久久伊人草 | 一区二区三区四区免费 | 国产人成一区二区三区影院 | 精品久久久视频 | 噜噜噜在线视频 | 97视频网站 | 欧美精品久 | 精品无码久久久久久国产 | 中文有码视频 |