They will not be given a negative assessment during performance appraisals organized by government agencies, according to the draft.

Yin Yicui, chairwoman of Shanghai People's Congress Standing Committee, said on Wednesday that the decision is expected to help sweep away the fear of government agencies from taking responsibility when launching bold reforms.

Administrative inaction, rather than arbitrary conduct, has been plaguing governments because of the fear of taking responsibility if they fail, she said.

Li Tuo, a professor of political science at the Chinese Academy of Governance, said that one of the problems that China faces is the lack of motivation to launch reforms. "In the past, it was only an oral commitment to tolerate aborted pilot projects. If the decision is eventually passed, reformers can get legal guarantees and their passion to launch reforms will be motivated."

However, Yao Haitong, secretary-general of Shanghai People's Congress Standing Committee, called for a clear definition of reforms or innovations.

"We need supportive explanations to define what these reforms and innovations mean here because these are vague terms," he said during Wednesday's panel discussion.

Shen Zhixian, vice-president of Shanghai High People's Court, zeroed in on the immunity from administrative and legal liabilities in the clause.

"We agree with a tolerant attitude toward failed projects but that doesn't mean the responsibility can be exempted, especially when there is a huge loss," he said.

Chen Zhaofeng, another veteran legislator, said a decision by a local legislation cannot override national laws.

Li Ming, general manager of Shanghai East Asia (Group) Co, said that besides government agencies, enterprises and other institutions should also be tolerated to make mistakes when pursuing reforms and innovations.

He said financial losses from failed innovative attempts should be written off, apart from the legal and administrative liabilities.