日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Finance

IPO reforms draw skepticism in some quarters

By Yang Ziman | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-24 07:20

To guarantee fair pricing, the CSRC reform states that individual investors should be included in the price-setting process.

At least 20 individual or institutional investors are required for issues of less than 400 million shares. At least 50 such investors are required for larger issues.

Xiong Jinqiu, a financial expert, said the reform proposals place too much emphasis on prevention rather than punishment.

Overpriced new issues will only be temporarily suspended, at best. For instance, when new share prices rose last year, the CSRC concluded after a brief investigation that prices were being pushed up by many individual shareholders.

It did not occur to the commission, Xiong said, that the individuals might be acting collectively on behalf of a "price-rigging mastermind".

Since IPO reform no longer produces significant results, said Xiong, the CSRC should instead take tough steps to crack down on secondary market price manipulation to end fraudulent behavior.

The draft reforms also said that applicants waiting for IPO approval could issue bonds in the meantime to diversify their financing sources. Once approval is obtained, companies can choose the timing of the issue on their own.

Abolishing 'redline'

Further, the proposed reforms abolish the "25 percent" redline. According to IPO policies that prevailed last year, if the price-earnings ratio of the IPO is 25 percent higher than for comparable companies, the issuer must call a board meeting and submit an explanation to the CSRC. In that situation, the commission could order the issuer to reset the IPO price. Now, issuers would only have to release an explanation for the above-average prices and warn investors of potential risks.

Some analysts see the entire reform package as nothing more than tinkering with technical problems. Hua Sheng, a veteran economist and president of the Beijing Yanjing Overseas Chinese University, said that the proposal does not touch the most important issue - approval rights. The decision on conducting an IPO remains in the hands of the CSRC, rather than the market.

Lin Yixiang, chair of Beijing-based TX Investment Consulting, agreed with Hua's opinion that the reform sidesteps the question of "who decides who can go public". If the approval process remains the same, it is hard to make any breakthroughs.

Hua and Lin suggest the regulatory should loosen its control and leave it to the issuers and buyers themselves to decide when to go public, at whatever price, and whether or not the stocks are worth buying.

Xiong, however, is against the idea of loosening administrative power prematurely. The mainland stock market is still in its infancy, he said, and without CSRC oversight, issuers wouldn't wait to go public at any time, regardless of market conditions. This is because once listed, issuers have many prerogatives.

When companies see the stock market as an ideal place to rip off ignorant investors, lack of government involvement will do more harm than good.

Apart from increasing the accountability of issuers and underwriters, Ke Jingmin, a financial commentator, said the regulator itself should assume more responsibility.

Based on the principle of "with power comes responsibility", the CSRC must be accountable for giving the green light to IPO applicants who are later involved in fraudulent conduct.

The current system misleads investors into believing that companies that passed the CSRC's approval process are trustworthy, Ke said.

However, scandals such as those involving Green-land Biological Technology and Wanfu Biotechnology demonstrate that the CSRC's endorsement can't necessarily be relied on. The agency needs to be responsible for any approval it is going to grant, Ke added.

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天视频入口 | 色久网 | 国产又粗又猛又爽又黄的视频四季 | 日韩欧美一区在线 | 日韩一级免费毛片 | 国产中文在线播放 | 中文字幕精品三级久久久 | 精品视频亚洲 | 在线观看黄色小视频 | 小视频在线| 性福宝在线观看 | a天堂在线 | 欧美另类一区 | av免费资源 | 婷婷丁香色 | 91快色 | 亚洲国产影院 | 日本精品久久久久 | 日韩久久久久久久久 | 四虎影视av | 中文字幕第4页 | 国产精品日日夜夜 | 欧美成人黄色网 | 午夜美女视频 | 欧美一卡二卡 | 免费特级黄毛片 | 亚洲第一色站 | 国产第一精品 | 国产一区二区高清视频 | 欧美xxxx83d | 91精品国产欧美一区二区成人 | 国产又爽又黄视频 | 久久国产精品一区二区 | 亚洲免费黄色 | 狠狠干婷婷 | 国产黄色免费观看 | 成人资源在线 | 亚洲男人网站 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区在线播放 | 免费av网站在线看 | av毛片网站 |