|
Chinese courts witness more IPR protection cases
2001-12-25
peopledaily.com.cn
More cases involving IPR
Courts in Beijing have witnessed an increasing number of cases involving intellectual property rights (IPR) protection in recent years, as a result of the new challenges to judicial works posed by China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Overseas-related IPR cases that have been heard and ruled upon in Beijing are increasing, from zero in 1993 to 15 cases in the first 11 months of this year, said Zhang Lumin as saying, who is chief judge of the Intellectual Property Right Division of Beijing High People's Court.
In 1993, Beijing led the country in setting up a special IPR division in its high and intermediate courts. Since then, 59 overseas-related IPR cases have been heard, the daily quoted court statistics.
IPR provinsions required to be intensified
WTO rules call for judicial transparency, legal system unity and judicial independence, which must be intensified to meet world practices, Zhang said.
To better cooperate with the global community in IPR protection, China has joined many conventions, such as the Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization, the Berne Convention and the Madrid Agreement.
Over 32 percent of the overseas-related IPR cases handled by Beijing courts have involved trademark disputes, and more than 25 percent involved patent issues, said the China Daily report.
In a recent IPR case, Japanese electronic giant Mitsubishi asked for over 36.5 million yuan (4.4 million U.S. dollars) in compensation from a Beijing-based company that violated its trademark right.
Amended law to take effect soon
The Beijing High People's Court, in line with the newly revised Trademark Law, urged the Beijing company to pay Mitsubishi 500,000yuan (60,240 U.S. dollars), the largest IPR compensation sum ever seen in Beijing, the report quoted Cheng Yongsun, a judge, as saying.
The amended Trademark Law that took effect on December 1 will better protect the interests of the trademark owners and allow for more severe punishment of infringers, Cheng said.
|
.gif){kind=small}
.gif){kind=small}
