|
Iran ends voluntary cooperation with IAEA
(AP)
Updated: 2006-02-05 19:17
Iran said Sunday it has ended all voluntary cooperation with the U.N. nuclear
watchdog but would still hold talks with Moscow on a proposal to enrich Iranian
uranium in Russia, reversing an earlier decision to abandon those talks.
|
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, raises
his fists during a public welcoming ceremony as he arrived from New York
where he attended the U.N General Assembly, at the Mehrabad airport, in
Tehran, Iran, in this Sunday, Sept. 18, 2005, file photo. Iran's president
Saturday ordered an end to snap inspections of its facilities after the
U.N. nuclear watchdog voted to report Tehran to the Security Council.
[AP]
| Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki
said Iran had implemented the president's orders to end voluntary cooperation
with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had ordered the move Saturday in response to
the U.N. agency decision to refer Iran to the Security Council over fears the
country is trying to develop a nuclear bomb. It means Iran will resume uranium
enrichment and will no longer allow snap IAEA inspections of its nuclear
facilities — voluntary measures it had allowed in recent years in a gesture to
build trust.
"We ended all the voluntary cooperation we have been extending to the IAEA in
the past two-and-a-half to three years, on the basis of the president's order,"
Mottaki said. "We do not have any obligation toward the additional protocol
(anymore)."
The action was required under a law passed last year.
Iran has repeatedly stressed that it will continue to honor its commitments
under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty but that it has the right to pursue a
peaceful nuclear program.
"Adoption of the policy of resistance doesn't mean we are on non-speaking
terms or noncooperative," Mottaki said. "Yesterday we had two options. One was
the option of resistance and the other was surrender. We chose resistance."
Earlier, Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said Iran was open to
negotiations on a Moscow's proposal that Iran shift its plan for large-scale
enrichment of uranium to Russian territory. The plan is intended to allay world
suspicions that Iran might use the process to develop a nuclear bomb.
Uranium enriched to a low degree is used as fuel for nuclear reactors. But
highly enriched uranium is suitable for making atomic bombs.
"The situation has changed. Still, we will attend talks with Russia on
February 16," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said at a press
conference.
"The proposal has to conform itself with the new circumstances," he added.
"If the Russian proposal makes itself compatible with the new conditions, it can
be negotiated."
His comments came a day after Javad Vaeidi, deputy head of the powerful
National Security Council, said there was there was "no adequate reason to
pursue the Russian plan."
It was not clear if the change of course represented a major shift in Iran's
strategy in the crisis over its nuclear activities. Asefi said "the door for
negotiations is still open" over Iran's nuclear program.
"We don't fear the Security Council. It's not the end of the world," he
added.
"The proposal has to conform itself with the new circumstances," Asefi said.
"If the Russian proposal makes itself compatible with the new conditions, it can
be negotiated."
Iran has said the Russian proposal has ambiguities that need to be clarified
in talks. Iranian officials have also said Tehran would reject the proposal if
it sought to prevent Iran from enriching uranium inside the country. They insist
it must only be a complementary measure to Iran's nuclear program.
Earlier Sunday, Ahmadinejad brushed off the IAEA referral.
"Issue as many resolutions like this as you want and make yourself happy. You
can't prevent the progress of the Iranian nation," he said in comments carried
by the official Islamic Republic News Agency.
"In the name of the IAEA they want to visit all our nuclear facilities and
learn our defense capabilities, but we won't allow them to do this," he added.
Asefi reiterated that Iran would cooperate with the IAEA within the framework
of the NPT and the Safeguard Agreement.
"We chose our way wisely. We have solutions for all situations that may
develop. Referring Iran to the Security Council will definitely harm the other
party more than Iran," Asefi said.
Twenty-seven of 35 member nations on the IAEA board voted for Iran's
referral, reflecting more than two years of intense lobbying by the United
States and its allies to enlist broad backing for such a move. Cuba, Venezuela
and Syria voted against, and five members abstained.
After years of opposition, Russia and China backed the referral last week,
bringing support from other nations who had been waiting for their lead.
But in return, Moscow and Beijing demanded that the Americans — and France
and Britain, the two other veto-wielding Security Council members — agree to let
the Iran issue rest until at least March, when the IAEA board meets again to
review the agency's investigation of Iran's nuclear program and its compliance
with board demands that it renounce uranium enrichment.
|
