日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

In the press

Updated: 2013-09-24 07:07

By Cho Wai(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

'Civil nomination' illegal

Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit, who is a big-shot lawyer by trade, said on a radio program the other day that he "cannot see" how the "civil nomination" format proposed by the Alliance for True Democracy and his party violates the Basic Law: "If you take a look at Article 45 of the Basic Law, it says very clearly that Chief Executive (CE) election candidates shall be nominated by a broadly representative nomination committee through a democratic process."

Leong's words are totally meant to mislead the public, because the Basic Law contains nothing about "civil nomination" and he was attempting to reduce the nomination committee to a rubber stamp. That is why it goes against the Basic Law and relevant decisions of the National People's Congress Standing Committee.

Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong SAR, pointed out in a written reply to Leong earlier this month that "civil nomination" totally ignores relevant provisions of the Basic Law, adding that "legal professionals should know better than others the importance of the rule of law and never cross the line." It appears Leong has abandoned the basic code of conduct of legal professionals in order to satisfy his own political needs.

Article 45 of the Basic Law stipulates that the ultimate goal of Hong Kong's democratic development is the election of the CE and members of the Legislative Council (LegCo) by universal suffrage; and CE election candidates will be nominated by "a broadly representative nomination committee", meaning it will be an institutional nomination process instead of an individual one.

"Civil nomination", on the other hand, relies on individual voters and anyone who has collected a certain number or more of voter signatures can stand for CE election. If "civil nomination" is adopted the term "broadly representative" will be irrelevant, as the nomination committee is redundant. In that case shouldn't the Basic Law be rewritten with "civil nomination" replacing references to the nomination committee?

The author is a current affairs commentator. This is an excerpted translation of his column published in Wen Wei Po on Sept 23.

In the press

(HK Edition 09/24/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 99色网站| 国产精品福利一区 | 激情丁香六月 | 欧美精品久久久 | 亚洲小视频在线观看 | 国产精品香蕉 | 激情五月婷婷综合 | 男人视频网站 | 五月婷婷激情综合 | 久久综合视频网 | 在线网站你懂的 | 成人黄色av网站 | 在线免费观看毛片 | 精品日韩一区 | 黑人と日本人の交わりビデオ | 99在线精品视频免费观看20 | 中文字字幕在线中文乱码 | 日本黄色免费网址 | 日韩91在线| 午夜小视频在线 | 国产欧美小视频 | 一及黄色片 | 黄色av免费播放 | 亚洲天堂精品在线 | 99热这里只有精品1 99热免费精品 | 欧美一卡二卡在线观看 | 久久超| 福利姬在线播放 | 国产精品久久久久久久av | 久久网站视频 | jizz黄色片| 九九九精品视频 | 成人午夜视频在线观看 | 中文一区二区 | 97福利| 国产黄色影视 | 日本a级大片 | 丁香色综合| 麻豆视频在线观看免费网站黄 | 国产一级二级av | 天天摸天天干 |