日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Has government hamstrung its new anti-discrimination body?

Updated: 2013-10-10 07:15

By Nigel Collett(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

The Hong Kong press is busy exposing allegations of corruption against the last chief executive, Donald Tsang Yam-kuen, who scuttled out of office in June 2012 accused of accepting gifts of travel and accommodation in return for preferential treatment. It is now alleged that evidence in a case connected with Italy's former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi was not released by Hong Kong authorities, not for any monetary gain, but to gain Tsang, a Roman Catholic, an audience with the Pope.

The case indicates clearly the way Hong Kong figures allow their religious beliefs to leach into public business. Hong Kong is a modern, secular society, but many of its public servants prefer to be guided not by principles of democracy, law or human rights, but by their Christian beliefs. Hong Kong's LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transsexual) community is no stranger to this; it has long suffered from theologically inspired oppression.

In January, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying was so wary of taking on the Christian lobby that he ruled out even consulting the public on LGBT issues. In March, in response to this, LGBT groups withdrew en masse from the Sexual Minorities Forum (SMF), the body set up in 2004 to handle LGBT issues. Its work had been disrupted when the government invited the New Creation Association (NCA) to membership. This was a group affiliated to American Exodus International, one of the prime proponents of the "reparative therapy", which claimed to be able to "pray away the gay". The NCA claimed to represent "ex-gays", but its presence destroyed any hope that the SMF might function effectively.

The government, of course, did not want the SMF to be effective. Its real purpose was to indicate to the world that "something was being done".

When Hong Kong's LGBT organizations called this bluff and withdrew, the government was faced with the destruction of its position. It had claimed that there was no consensus for change in Hong Kong, yet survey after survey was finding that public opinion was increasingly in favor of reform. It had claimed that, in setting up the SMF, it had taken active steps to ameliorate the lot of the LGBT community. Now the SMF had been exposed for the sham it was. As legislation, or even consultation, was considered just too dangerous, the easy option was to delay. So was born the Advisory Group on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities (AGEDASM). This, it was promised, would have members with more clout than those of the SMF it replaced.

The LGBT community was skeptical, but decided on balance to give the new body the benefit of the doubt. Things initially boded well. Membership was restricted to individual appointees, so avoiding the issue of the inclusion of any "ex-gays". As the group's chairperson, a respected figure of great standing was appointed, Professor Fanny Cheung Miu-ching, pro-vice-chancellor of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and earlier the founding chairperson of the Equal Opportunities Commission. Members included Ray Chan Chi-chuen of People Power, the only openly gay LegCo member, as well as five prominent members of LGBT groups and other academics and representatives of the business community. These, it seemed, were not individuals likely to allow themselves to be taken for a ride.

Has government hamstrung its new anti-discrimination body?

Unfortunately, doubts have now arisen. To "give balance" we are told, AGEDASM appointed two individuals opposed to equality or protection for the LGBT community. One is Professor Kwan Kai-man of the Department of Religion and Philosophy at Hong Kong Baptist University, a fundamentalist Christian and a speaker for the Society of Truth and Light. The other is LegCo member Priscilla Leung Mei-fung, a participant in the successful campaign to prevent public consultation earlier in the year.

The government has a track record of delay and deliberate obfuscation in LGBT matters. It badly needs to prove that it is raising its game, but it is not doing this so far. The LGBT community is watching the work of AGEDASM with growing impatience. It will not wait so long next time to expose an organization it suspects has been established to work to its detriment.

The author is Hong Kong correspondent for the Singapore-based LGBT online newsletter fridae.com. In 2008 he was appointed English secretary of the Pink Alliance, Hong Kong's largest grouping of LGBT organizations and he remains prominent in LGBT activism in that post. He was a founder in 2011 of Pink Season, the annual celebration of LGBT culture.

(HK Edition 10/10/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本黄a三级三级三级 | 久久综合久久久 | 亚洲五月综合 | 日韩一区二区在线播放 | 国产在线激情视频 | 国产乱真实合集 | 国产婷婷色一区二区三区在线 | 国产精品久久久久久久久久妞妞 | 日韩免费久久 | 久久午夜免费视频 | 在线看日韩| 日韩资源在线观看 | 国产成人av一区二区三区 | 欧美一级做性受免费大片免费 | 亚洲人成人 | 69超碰| 欧美一级特黄aaaaaa | 一区二区三区视频免费观看 | 欧美亚洲一级 | 影音先锋国产 | 久久免费国产 | 午夜一级免费 | 国产手机在线 | 国产精品久久999 | 黄色片在线免费观看 | 蜜臀传媒 | 在线免费看 | 韩国演艺圈悲惨事件在线 | 午夜精品久久久久久久第一页按摩 | 国产高清一区 | 日本亚洲最大的色成网站www | 三级国产三级在线 | 新黄色网址 | 欧美视频一区二区在线 | 蜜臀久久久久 | 一区二区三区一级片 | 精品欧美乱码久久久久久 | 五月天婷婷综合 | 欧美a免费 | 国产精品黄色在线观看 | 国内激情自拍 |