日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Radical politicians don't care about true democracy

Updated: 2014-05-26 07:15

By Yan Ming(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Opposition lawmakers scored a "win" against the public interest and the government by delaying approval of the government funding bill past the mid-May deadline with their unpopular filibuster. They knew the delay would force the government to suspend some services and this would infuriate many people. But they went ahead anyway.

Some people may wonder why these politicians are so reckless and unreasonable. The answer is quite simple: Whatever consequences, the filibusters will not harm their personal interests in the future. They could not care less about the negative impact their actions have on the public.

Some commentators have urged people to condemn opposition lawmakers using filibusters by not voting for them in the next Legislative Council (LegCo) election.

But this is not the first time that critics of filibustering politicians have urged them to be made accountable. Why do those radical lawmakers keep doing such unpopular acts? Are they not afraid of not being re-elected? Actually, there is no evidence they intend committing political suicide. They probably think they can get away with it.

Radical politicians don't care about true democracy

Filibustering is nothing new in Western parliamentary democracies. In the United Kingdom, it has been developed into an art form. In the United States, many people are surprised when filibustering does not occur. But it is a tactic which the minority imposes on the majority. It is rarely popular with most of the public. People sponsoring such filibusters tend to be widely criticized.

However, popular indignation at the time of filibustering is usually forgotten or ignored during legislative elections. After all, such indignation cannot stop politicians enjoying moments of political entitlement. So, filibusters will happen no matter who gets elected.

Besides, the existing electoral systems enable politicians to win elections by securing "vote lockers" in their constituencies. The term "vote locker" refers to voters who support certain candidates blindly. They help candidates become legislators - a position that can be a "license to betray (the public trust)" - until the next election. Usually filibustering politicians will "spin" their way out of any resulting PR crisis. They also pretend to be oblivious to public disapproval of their irresponsible behavior.

The sad reality is Hong Kong is suffering from having too many filibusters due to its current electoral system - or system of proportional representation. LegCo members who are currently sponsoring filibuster bills are all repeat "offenders". This suggests they have developed effective ways to secure their own "vote lockers". This allows them to defy popular wishes, without having to worry too much about their public image.

All political analysts agree "vote lockers" are instrumental in winning elections under the current system. This is what candidates care most about. Of course, campaign platforms remain significant, but only for their effectiveness in rounding up loyal supporters. So opposition politicians blame the government as well as their competitors for problems which upset their "targeted" constituents, without proposing any practical solutions.

While campaigning, some of them may also touch on economic policies which directly affect people's lives. But they almost never follow up on these issues after being elected. They are too busy undermining the government. In their minds, democracy is relevant only when it works in their favor. They use the existing democratic system to ensure it does.

The same theory applies today to the issue of "true democracy". This is a catchy phrase the opposition camp uses to get some kind of a moral vantage point over the pro-establishment side. They are acting as if they want direct elections more than anything else. But this could not be further from the truth. They stick to their uncompromising stands because it is the best way to delay progress toward universal suffrage. This is so they can continue profiting from the current system of proportional representation.

They are also betting that the central government will never abandon patriotism and a commitment to full cooperation between Hong Kong and the mainland. That is why they refuse to be patriots and insist on "no political screening" in the nomination process.

The radical opposition parties know they can put Hong Kong's constitutional development on hold by hanging on to unconstitutional demands such as "civil nomination", "political party nomination" and the "three-track format". Their ultimate goal is to turn Hong Kong into an independent political entity serving the interests of Western powers. They will have little chance of winning any election by universal suffrage, so they will do anything they can to prevent it happening - at all costs. These costs include social unrest, an economic slowdown and maybe even bloodshed. They will do whatever it takes to ruin Hong Kong's status as a special administrative region and a financial center. Not surprisingly, the radical opposition groups are enthusiastic about the illegal "Occupy Central" campaign and "referendum".

The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

(HK Edition 05/26/2014 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲性网 | 成人毛片视频免费看 | 日韩欧美中文在线观看 | 成人免费播放 | 人人干97 | 成人免费公开视频 | 久久久精品影院 | 成人福利视频在线观看 | 最近日韩中文字幕中文 | 大色网小色网 | 四虎中文字幕 | 久久一区二区精品 | 欧美绿帽合集xxxxx | 狠狠操在线观看 | 免费看黄在线 | 亚洲天堂免费视频 | 久久国内精品视频 | 亚洲人免费视频 | 欧美精品黑人猛交高潮 | 激情丁香六月 | 四虎影院www | 国产一区二区三区久久久 | 欧美激情视频在线播放 | 精品国产一区二区三区久久久蜜月 | 国产麻豆精品在线 | 国产xxx视频 | 亚洲一区在线免费观看 | 五月天婷婷激情 | 久久久免费 | 三级在线观看视频 | 久草免费在线播放 | 五月婷婷色丁香 | 欧美视频三区 | 伊人再见免费在线观看高清版 | 国产一区a | 天天舔天天插 | 国产成人免费在线 | 亚洲一本之道 | 国产十区 | 日本在线视频一区二区 | 国产三级精品三级观看 |