日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Top Stories

UN International Court had no role in Philippines case

By Wang Qingyun | China Daily | Updated: 2016-07-15 08:24

The International Court of Justice rushed to dispel the myth that it was involved in the South China Sea arbitration case filed by the Philippines, just as the United Nations made a similar online clarification.

The ICJ, the UN's principal organ of justice, issued a notice on its website that it is "a totally distinct institution" from the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which offered secretarial assistance to the Arbitral Tribunal that ruled on the case. The ICJ said it "has had no involvement in" that case.

It pointed out that it has posted no information about the case on its website and said that anyone seeking such information must refer to the PCA's website.

On Wednesday, the UN said on its Sina Weibo micro blog that it "has nothing to do with" the PCA, though the ICJ is located in the Peace Palace in The Hague, as is the PCA.

Foreign Ministry spokesman LuKang said on Thursday that these clarifications "show there is no legitimacy or representativeness to how the temporary tribunal was composed and operated, as well as show that its so-called ruling has no authority or credibility at all, and is totally invalid and not binding.

"It seems that this also is the reason why after this illegal ruling came out, only three or four countries wishfully claimed that it was 'legally binding'," Lu said.

Zhao Jianwen, a researcher at the Institute of International Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the reason the UN and the ICJ made such statements is that they "want to stay clear" of the ruling in the arbitration case, which, as Zhao said quoting Vice-Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin, might become "a notorious case".

Zhao said "All of the tribunal's expenses were paid by the Philippines, including its arbitrators' wages, and these experts' opinions are not neutral". Also, the tribunal has no substantive relation with the PCA, he added.

The only relation between them is that the PCA offered secretarial service to the tribunal and the tribunal was held in the PCA's hall, Zhao explained.

Zhao pointed out that the Arbitral Tribunal was a temporary one set up specially for proceeding the South China Sea case, and its work was "virtually done" once the ruling was issued.

wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

 

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕久久久 | 免费黄色在线视频 | 成人免费看毛片 | 亚洲黄视频 | 琪琪色av| 爱爱高潮视频 | 国产精品xxxx | 开心春色激情网 | 亚洲午夜影视 | 欧美另类色图 | 精品久久久在线观看 | 偷拍亚洲另类 | 日本精品视频一区二区三区 | 91啦中文 | 魔性的诱惑 | 成年人在线免费观看视频网站 | 午夜伦理福利 | 网爆门在线观看 | 亚洲成人一区二区 | 免费毛片观看 | 国产黄频 | 亚洲永久免费精品 | 国产内射毛片 | 亚洲最大成人在线 | 国产乱人乱偷精品视频 | 日本免费黄色小视频 | 黄网址在线观看 | 欧美成人三级 | 久久久久久不卡 | 夜夜cao| 欧美成人免费一级人片100 | 永久免费看片视频教学 | 九色在线播放 | 五月婷婷综合久久 | 中文字幕在线天堂 | 国产精品一二三四五区 | 国产精品自拍在线观看 | 一呦二呦三呦精品网站 | 看免费黄色大片 | 日韩激情网站 | 午夜久久久久久久久久影院 |