日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

   
 
Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC
(China Daily)
Updated: 2011-12-21

 Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC

Customers try out HTC Corp products in Taipei. Apple Inc still has one other patent case against HTC. Maurice Tsai / Bloomberg

WASHINGTON - Apple Inc won a patent-infringement ruling that bans some HTC Corp smartphones from the United States starting next year, bolstering efforts to prove that devices running Google Inc's Android operating system copy the Apple iPhone.

The US International Trade Commission, in a review of a judge's findings in July, said on Monday that HTC is violating one Apple patent related to data-detection technology and issued a limited import exclusion order that takes effect April 19.

"HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon," Grace Lei, general counsel for HTC, said in an e-mail.

The six-member commission determined that three other patents in the case weren't infringed.

While less than what Apple sought, the ruling gives the company its first victory in patent cases designed to slow the growth of Android, which Steve Jobs claimed "ripped off the iPhone". Apple has one other case against HTC, as well as complaints against Samsung Electronics Co and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc, and is involved in more than a dozen other cases before the trade commission.

"The battle between Apple and Android is going to continue," said Peter Toren, a patent lawyer with Shulman Rogers. "I'm not sure this decision - the way it is - is enough to push the parties to settlement. Apple doesn't have the leverage of a total exclusionary order."

The list of affected products and a full reason for the commission's decision, which is subject to appeal and a presidential review, wasn't immediately made public. Apple's original complaint named HTC's Nexus One, Touch Pro, Diamond, Tilt II, Dream, myTouch, Hero and Droid Eris.

Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, declined to discuss the possibility of a settlement. She repeated the company's position that "competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology".

Representatives from Google had no immediate comment.

The ruling is the first definitive decision in the dozens of patent cases that began to proliferate in 2010 as smartphone makers battle over a market that Strategy Analytics Inc said increased 44 percent last quarter from a year earlier to 117 million phones worldwide.

HTC, the second-largest maker of Android phones, used its partnership with Google to help transform itself from a contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest US smartphone seller in the third quarter.

HTC generated about $5 billion in US sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Apple. That's more than half of HTC's $9 billion in global sales last year.

The commission's order applies to new phone imports and doesn't force HTC to pull existing devices off US store shelves.

HTC phones accounted for 24 percent of the US smartphone market in the third quarter based on shipments, the research company Canalys reported on Oct 31.

Samsung held 21 percent of the market and Apple 20 percent. The market is volatile, and the Apple iPhone 4s that went on sale in October and Samsung's newest Galaxy phone are likely to change the rankings for the fourth quarter.

Apple contended in its complaint that the HTC phones infringed four patents. Administrative Law Judge Carl Charneski in July sided with Apple for two of the patents: the data-detection one and the other covering the transmission of multiple types of data. The commission overturned the judge's findings on that patent and affirmed his determination that the remaining two patents weren't infringed.

Bloomberg News

(China Daily 12/21/2011 page16)



Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

Can an expired patent be applied again?

What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 特黄特色大片bbbb | 国产精品日韩欧美大师 | 91丨九色丨丰满人妖 | 黄色大片免费观看 | 国产一级av毛片 | 国产原创麻豆 | 操操操综合网 | 日本精品视频一区二区 | 婷婷俺也去| 欧美一区二区三区在线看 | 天堂中文字幕在线观看 | 精品视频久久久久久久 | 国产综合精品 | 亚洲黄色一级 | 国产欧美一级片 | 亚洲男人在线 | 男女插插插视频 | 日韩不卡中文字幕 | 18岁成年人网站 | 精品国产一区在线观看 | 久热只有精品 | 成年人香蕉视频 | 亚洲不卡在线观看 | 久久久www成人免费毛片 | 日本91| 国产xxxx性hd极品 | 国产美女在线播放 | 2019天天操 | 欧美福利在线视频 | 天天久久久 | 日本欧美视频 | 视频一二区 | av中文资源在线 | 欧美性aaa | 国内精品久久久久久久 | 国产极品少妇 | 91亚洲国产成人精品一区 | 毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片 | 免费观看的毛片 | 成人一级视频在线观看 | 怡红院一区二区 |