日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / OP Rana

Trying to measure Earth's value with money is weird

By Op Rana (China Daily) Updated: 2015-05-23 07:35

Trying to measure Earth's value with money is weird

Despite a high urbanization rate, Foshan city conserves a friendly ecosystem in Guangdong province.

Money has become omnipotent. It is used to measure the value of life and increasingly so to determine the cost of death. Economists have been trying to assign monetary value to every living and non-living objects. Just the other day an American paid $350,000 Namibian authorities to hunt an endangered black rhino saying the amount was enough to compensate for the loss and would help raise awareness about wildlife and boost efforts to save the species from extinction.

Of course, the American national has received scathing criticism and death threats as conservationists and wildlife lovers have reacted to the hunt of one of the most endangered species. But then the power of money has not been lost on anyone.

Before this news saddened and angered people across the world, some researchers assigned monetary values to some of Mother Earth's most important ecosystems. Their contention is that the exercise will help prioritize conservation efforts and funding. They have described the research into the services rendered by our ecosystems as "the benefits people derive from ecosystems - the support of sustainable human well-being that ecosystems provide". Placing financial values on environmental resources, they say, will help raise awareness about the importance of ecosystems and biodiversity.

If their view sounds similar to with that of the American hunter, it is more than coincidental. But more shocking are the absurdly small financial values they have assigned to the nine ecosystems. For instance, the worth of tropical forests is only $2,335 per hectare, prompting the questions: How can the ecosystem that is home to half of the plant and animal species despite covering only 6 percent of the Earth's land surface be worth just more than a couple of thousand dollars. Are the food and pharmaceuticals the tropical forests provide worth only a pittance? How can one place a value on such forests' biodiversity and climate stabilization properties?

Incidentally, open oceans are worth only $135, temperate forests $1,127 and grasslands $2,698 per hectare. All the open oceans, Atlantic, Pacific, Indian and Arctic, and the millions of life forms they are home to are under threat. So are grasslands that give us food, water and other natural resources and help keep climate change in check. Yet they are worth almost nothing.

The monetary value of coastal ecosystems, according to the study, is a pitiable $26,760 per hectare. Coastal and inland wetlands are worth only $12,163 and $16,534 a hectare, and lakes a shocking $3,938 a hectare. According to the UN Environmental Programme, about 40 percent of the people live within 100 kilometers of coastlines, which means they get sustenance from coastal ecosystems and wetlands. Yet the combined worth of the two coastal systems is worth a mere $38,933 a hectare.

Perhaps something went wrong with the study. Else, how could the researchers assign a monetary value of 197,900 per hectare to coral reefs? Still, it does not do any justice to the true worth of coral reefs, which apart from their wide range of biodiversity also provide food for an estimated 1 billion people.

We need money to survive, but money is not the be all and end all of life. Assigning monetary value to every natural resource and system may be a good idea for the market, but it is certainly not conducive to protecting the planet. The nine ecosystems the researchers have studied have sustained life for millions of years. And their worth is beyond the value of all human possessions.

Yet the study has tried to weigh the ecosystems with a few a pieces of paper, which incidentally we get by exploiting the same ecosystems.

Is this a ploy to let market forces run amok with even the most sacrosanct benefits that nature has to offer? The answer is obvious.

The author is a senior editor with China Daily. oprana@hotmail.com

(China Daily 05/23/2015 page5)

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产午夜网站 | 中文字幕日韩一区二区三区 | 中文天堂在线视频 | 2021国产精品| 中文字幕精品在线观看 | 一区二区三区有限公司 | www.色网站| 美国做爰xxxⅹ性视频 | 亚洲视频观看 | 精品久久久久久一区二区里番 | 婷婷伊人综合中文字幕 | 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁av麻豆男男 | 国产福利网站 | 欧产日产国产69 | 亚洲欧美日本在线观看 | 黄色大片黄色大片 | 哪里看毛片 | 91亚洲国产成人精品性色 | 国产无遮挡 | 视频一区欧美 | www.色图 | 99免费精品| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久蜜月 | 欧美专区在线 | 超碰公开在线 | 午夜激情视频在线观看 | 日日cao| 在线观看小视频 | 艳母免费在线观看 | 欧洲精品一区二区 | 久久精品一二 | 久久午夜精品 | av亚洲精品 | 国产精选一区 | 黄色一级网 | 国产一级淫片a视频免费观看 | 91精品久久久久久综合五月天 | 一级黄色片在线播放 | 三区四区在线观看 | 欧美成人一区二区三区片免费 | 亚洲天堂自拍 |