日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Ttkexpress vs Jingdong is a contract dispute

China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-23 07:50

Ttkexpress vs Jingdong is a contract dispute

Visitors watch a screen showing smart sorting technologies at a JD.com booth at an expo during World Intelligence Congress in Tianjin, June 30, 2017. [Photo/VCG]

TTKEXPRESS, AN EXPRESS DELIVERY COMPANY, announced on Thursday it is suing its partner Jingdong, one of the largest e-commerce companies in China, claiming it is interfering in its business. Southern Metropolis Daily comments:

Ttkexpress claims Jingdong is trying to restrict it to doing business with only clients designated by Jingdong.

Jingdong operates its own logistics company, as well as 16 contracted express-delivery companies, including Ttkexpress. The other 15 delivery companies have so far not made any similar complaints against Jingdong, which suggests that the e-commerce company is not trying to elbow out all of its contracted express delivery companies, so as to benefit its own delivery company.

The fact is Jingdong's own logistics company, though efficient and reliable in many big cities, still cannot meet all the delivery needs of the company. It has to cooperate with the other express delivery companies, especially to cover the remote areas.

To protect the interests of the consumers as well as its partners, Jingdong is justified in taking measures to minimize the negative influence caused by any of its partners, be they retailers or delivery companies.

Jingdong has said it will "resolutely" respond to the law suit, making the counterclaim that Ttkexpress had broken the contract between them because of the flood of complaints about the poor service provided by Ttkexpress.

There should be clear stipulation of the rights and obligations of Jingdong and the express delivery companies in their contracts, which should serve as the foundation to settle the disputes between the two parties.

The dispute between the two business partners is confined to a breach of contract. Neither the Antiunfair Competition Law nor the Antitrust Law is applicable. It is too early for the Ttkexpress to overstate the routine bickering as a legal case related to unfair competition in an attempt to win the public's sympathy.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 啪啪福利社 | 黄色影视大全 | 亚洲第八页 | 日韩精品午夜 | 色综合一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品麻豆 | 久久色网站 | 一起草av在线 | 久久午夜片| 久操伊人 | 在线观看亚洲大片短视频 | av大片免费看 | 性色av一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久午夜视频 | 日韩精品色哟哟 | 密桃成人av | 亚洲男女天堂 | 色婷婷视频在线观看 | 日韩免费精品 | 操你啦在线视频 | 国产 欧美 精品 | 超碰伊人网 | 亚洲第一区av | 懂色av蜜臂av粉嫩av | 激情网五月天 | 亚洲精品国产成人 | 日韩精品极品视频在线观看免费 | 日韩欧美亚洲国产 | 九九九国产视频 | 国产精品夜夜夜爽阿娇 | 欧美一区日韩一区 | 精品九九九九 | 久久婷婷色综合 | 97久久精品视频 | 伊人激情视频 | 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁 | 一级片黄色 | www.婷婷色| 美女黄色av| 国产另类自拍 | 免费视频中文字幕 |