Guards forcibly ejected a defense lawyer from the courtroom and the chief
judge shouted down Saddam Hussein on Monday in a stormy start to a new session
of the trial of the former Iraqi leader and members of his regime.
![The trial of Saddam Hussein and seven co-defendants over the massacre of Shiite villagers resumed with the ejection of one of Saddam's female defense attorneys. Picture shows Saddam during a trial session last week. [AFP]](xin_1905032216423752381526.jpg)
The trial of Saddam
Hussein and seven co-defendants over the massacre of Shiite villagers
resumed with the ejection of one of Saddam's female defense attorneys.
Picture shows Saddam during a trial session last week.
[AFP] |
The squabble began when chief judge
informed defense lawyer Bushra Khalil that she would be allowed to return to the
court after being removed from a session in April for arguing with the judge.
But when she tried to make a statement, he quickly cut her off, saying, "Sit
down."
"I just want to say one word," she said, but Abdel-Rahman yelled at guards to
take her away. Khalil pulled off her judicial robe and threw it on the floor in
anger, then tried to push the guards who were grabbing her hands, shouting, "Get
away from me."
As she was pulled out of the court, Saddam objected from the defendants' pen,
and Abdel-Rahman told him to be silent.
"I'm Saddam Hussein, president of Iraq. I am above all," Saddam shouted back.
"You are a defendant now, not a president," the judge barked.
Recent sessions of the trial have been remarkably orderly because
Abdel-Rahman has taken a tough line to put a stop to frequent outbursts by
Saddam and his co-defendants. He first removed the Lebanese-born Khalil, the
only woman on the defense team, in an April 5 session after she objected to a
video of Saddam shown by prosecutors.
After the outbursts Monday, the court resumed hearing defense witnesses.
Saddam and seven former members of his regime face possible execution by hanging
if convicted on charges of crimes against humanity in a crackdown against
Shiites in the town Dujail in the 1980s.
Saddam and the upper-level defendants have insisted the sweep of arrests -
in which some detainees, including women and children, died in prison and
148 Shiites were sentenced to death - was a justified response to a 1982
assassination attempt on Saddam in the town.
Monday's first witness was a former employee of the Revolutionary Court,
Murshid Mohammed Jassim, who testified on behalf of defendant Awad al-Bandar,
the judge who sentenced the 148 to death. Abdel-Rahman has accused al-Bandar of
convicting the Shiites without a proper trial, though al-Bandar has maintained
the trial was fair.
Jassim, who shook his cane at times as he spoke, acknowledged that he did not
work at the court at the time of the Dujail trial in 1984. But he insisted the
court was "the most fair, the most just ... (Al-Bandar) is a quiet, polite, fair
man."
He said the Revolutionary Court always gave defendants a full chance to
defend themselves and ensured they had lawyers and that Saddam or his officials
never intervened in its proceedings.
Referring to the ejection of Khalil, al-Bandar asked Jassim, "Were defense
lawyers ever thrown out of court when they tried to make an argument." Jassim
said no, then added: "Lawyers were always treated with respect in accordance
with the law."
Al-Bandar has said the 148 defendants confessed. But he has also acknowledged
that there was only one defense lawyer for all of them and the trial only lasted
16 days.
The prosecution has argued that it was a show-trial in which the defendants
had no opportunity to present their cases. It has presented documents showing
that a number of minors below the age of 18 were convicted, including one as
young as 11.
The prosecution has also argued that the crackdown went far beyond the
perpetrators of the attack on Saddam, sweeping up entire families in an attempt
to punish the town.
