WORLD> America
|
WORLD> America
|
|
Former AIG head denies he started exec bonuses
(Agencies)
Updated: 2009-03-20 23:50 WASHINGTON – Former AIG chief executive officer Hank Greenberg said the company under his leadership never had the kind of retention bonus system that has subjected it to withering criticism.
"When I was there, nobody had a contract with the company, including me," Greenberg said in a nationally broadcast interview Friday. "If you didn't do the job, you didn't deserve to be there. We had a bonus plan based on performance."
"We want our money back and we want our money back now for the taxpayers," declared House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. The bonuses, totaling $165 million, were paid to employees of the troubled insurer, including to traders in the financial unit that nearly caused the company's collapse. On Wednesday, the current chairman and CEO of AIG, Edward Liddy, told Congress under oath that his predecessor was responsible for the financial problems the company now is experiencing, saying mistakes had been made on a scale few could have imagined. There have been two other executives at the top of AIG since Greenberg left and Liddy took charge. Martin Sullivan, a native of England who had worked with AIG for 37 years, replaced Greenberg as CEO in March 2005, when Greenberg was forced out amid accusations from then-New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer of fraudulent accounting. Former Citigroup Inc. executive Robert Willumstad took over from Sullivan in June, and was succeeded in September by Liddy, former chairman of Allstate Corp. In his CBS appearance Friday, Greenberg was asked directly if he would have paid out the retention bonuses had he still been at the helm of the company. "Absolutely not," he told the interviewer. Greenberg also said he didn't think Liddy was qualified to run the company, but stopped short of calling for his firing. "I think he should be replaced," he said. "You can call it what you want." Greenberg has sued AIG, saying the company that he led for 38 years misled investors about its exposure to subprime mortgages and ruined his fortune by lying about its financial health. The lawsuit filed earlier this month says Greenberg was the New York-based company's largest non-institutional shareholder. The company has said the suit is without merit. |
||||||
