日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
World / Asia-Pacific

UN International Court had no role in Philippines case

By Wang Qingyun (China Daily) Updated: 2016-07-15 08:24

The International Court of Justice rushed to dispel the myth that it was involved in the South China Sea arbitration case filed by the Philippines, just as the United Nations made a similar online clarification.

The ICJ, the UN's principal organ of justice, issued a notice on its website that it is "a totally distinct institution" from the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which offered secretarial assistance to the Arbitral Tribunal that ruled on the case. The ICJ said it "has had no involvement in" that case.

It pointed out that it has posted no information about the case on its website and said that anyone seeking such information must refer to the PCA's website.

On Wednesday, the UN said on its Sina Weibo micro blog that it "has nothing to do with" the PCA, though the ICJ is located in the Peace Palace in The Hague, as is the PCA.

Foreign Ministry spokesman LuKang said on Thursday that these clarifications "show there is no legitimacy or representativeness to how the temporary tribunal was composed and operated, as well as show that its so-called ruling has no authority or credibility at all, and is totally invalid and not binding.

"It seems that this also is the reason why after this illegal ruling came out, only three or four countries wishfully claimed that it was 'legally binding'," Lu said.

Zhao Jianwen, a researcher at the Institute of International Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the reason the UN and the ICJ made such statements is that they "want to stay clear" of the ruling in the arbitration case, which, as Zhao said quoting Vice-Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin, might become "a notorious case".

Zhao said "All of the tribunal's expenses were paid by the Philippines, including its arbitrators' wages, and these experts' opinions are not neutral". Also, the tribunal has no substantive relation with the PCA, he added.

The only relation between them is that the PCA offered secretarial service to the tribunal and the tribunal was held in the PCA's hall, Zhao explained.

Zhao pointed out that the Arbitral Tribunal was a temporary one set up specially for proceeding the South China Sea case, and its work was "virtually done" once the ruling was issued.

wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
Most Popular
Hot Topics

...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品久久久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 另类一区二区三区 | 久久国产精品久久精品国产 | 国产精品视频在线免费观看 | 日韩欧美在线一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久影院老司 | 大地资源高清在线视频 | 免费视频国产 | 天堂网视频在线 | 日韩欧美国产高清 | 国产精品视频免费在线观看 | 亚洲精品在线观看网站 | 国内精品久久久久久久 | 中文字幕在线观看91 | 欧洲精品一区 | 亚洲天堂99 | 欧美黄色短片 | 美女网站视频色 | 99久久婷婷国产精品综合 | 特黄视频| 欧美色综合天天久久综合精品 | 日本一区二区在线视频 | 久久中文精品 | 久久久久黄 | 手机看片1024日韩 | a级一级黄色片 | 欧美激情视频网 | 午夜欧美精品 | 激情网五月 | 久久天天干 | 精品热久久 | 亚洲一区二三区 | 成人午夜一区 | 久久草精品 | 中文在线免费观看 | 国产精品高潮呻吟 | 久久精品91 | 日本欧美一级 | a天堂在线资源 | 亚洲第一免费视频 | 欧美日韩三区 |