日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Experts' take on democracy and governance

By Ong Tee Keat, David Castrillon-Kerrigan | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2023-03-27 07:02
Share
Share - WeChat

 

It's time Washington reflected on its own problems

David Castrillon-Kerrigan

MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

The United States is at it again. As it did in late 2021, the White House is gearing up to host the second so-called Summit for Democracy, an event that is neither a summit nor about democracy, but rather an outright attempt by the administration of US President Joe Biden to line up and indoctrinate key partners against countries it perceives as rivals.

Leaders from 110 countries and territories were invited to the 2021 event. Some, like former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who spurred the Jan 8 riots in Brazil that sought to overturn Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's election as Brazil's president, chose to attend, while others, like the leaders of Pakistan and South Africa, declined the invitation in the face of discriminatory US policies. Still some others decided to politely accept the invitation but preferred to stay on the margins. That was the case for the leaders of 17 out of the 25 invited countries from Latin America and the Caribbean who participated but chose not to submit written commitments.

Washington is now hosting a second show. But as performative as this event may seem, it in fact comes with serious risks.

By reanimating the corpse of Cold War-era thinking that seeks to divide the world into competing blocs, events like the "Summit for Democracy" do not bring countries together; rather they set them apart.

The tragedy of this is twofold. On the one hand, it places the world on a collision course with the collective threats that no country, region, or bloc alone can face. As President Xi Jinping put it in his report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, "the world has entered a new period of turbulence and change". We face common challenges like climate change, pandemics, and the specter of a global recession and, hence, we expect a great power like the US to responsibly promote trust and to set aside differences. Instead, we see the US doubling down on drawing ideological lines that are extinguishing any hope for dialogue.

On the other hand, this is tragic in that the "Summit for Democracy" is no more than a smokescreen for diverting public attention from the US administration's failure to address the serious challenges faced by American democracy. The Biden administration may play up alleged threats by outside actors, but the real threat to it is from within.

Recent polls conducted by Pew show that US democracy is indeed in crisis. In December 2022, 62 percent of American respondents said they were "not satisfied with the way democracy is working in their country", the third-highest figure for dissatisfaction among the 19 mostly developed countries. In another survey conducted last year, only 20 percent said that they "trust the government to do what is right just about always/most of the time", slightly above the historic low of 10 percent in 2011 but well below the average 26.4 percent of the past 20 years.

This sentiment is the reflection of years of mismanagement by American elites. The average life expectancy in the US is the lowest among G7 countries, with a significant decline over the past four years. Also, the US saw 100 mass shootings by the first week of March this year, breaking the previous record. And the FBI reported recently that hate crimes are on the rise in the US: with only 79 percent of police precincts reporting data, 2021 saw 9,065 instances of this type of crime, up 11.6 percent year-on-year, with most victims being targeted because of their ethnicity or race. These are just a few illustrative examples of the dire conditions an average American lives in.

But as grim as the outlook may seem, there is still hope. At the opening ceremony of "CPC in Dialogue with World Political Parties" Xi charted a course toward a brighter future. The Global Civilization Initiative, which Xi proposed on March 15, places openness over division, mutual learning over imposition, and dialogue over hegemony. In such a large, diverse world, no country should try to play God by attempting to shape all other countries in its image. Diversity is not a threat but an asset. History teaches us to listen to and learn from each other no matter which form of democracy we practice.

Rather than project its insecurities toward others, the US still has time to reflect on its own problems and use the "Summit for Democracy" to address them. This will be good for not only the American people, but also the people in the rest of the world.

The author is a professor and researcher at Externado University of Colombia.

The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

|<< Previous 1 2   
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品区二区三区日本 | 久久精品这里只有精品 | 国产成人精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 视频一区中文字幕 | 欧美大片免费看 | 波多野结衣一级 | 黄色片aaa| 国产欧美一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品在线 | 黄网站在线免费看 | 国产v在线| 久久久亚洲天堂 | 久在线视频 | 一区二区高清在线 | 1级黄色大片 | 欧美国产精品 | 亚洲在线网站 | 好吊日在线 | 精品日韩一区二区三区 | 大香蕉毛片 | 中文字幕在线视频一区 | 国产又黄又爽视频 | 欧美成人小视频 | 欧美黄在线观看 | 色大师在线观看 | 中文字幕在线免费观看 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区中文字幕 | 超碰com| 色狠狠综合 | 国产视频1区2区 | 黄色一级片黄色一级片 | 深爱激情综合网 | 久久精品一二区 | 校园春色综合网 | 一区二区三区蜜桃 | 91精品国产91久久久久久黑人 | 欧美一级特黄aaaaaa在线看片 | 久久久免费av | 少妇综合网 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免费看 | 99精品在线观看 |