日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Comment

Judicial justice must stand in full light of transparency

By Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2026-01-20 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

In a development that is as perplexing as it is troubling, it recently came to light that China's official online portal for court judgments was quietly blurring or erasing the names of presiding judges from published rulings. This was not a minor technical glitch but what appeared to be a deliberate act — one that several legal experts have criticized as reducing solemn judicial decisions to something resembling "anonymous storytelling" or, in a more cynical reading, "legal fiction".

The Supreme People's Court, China's top court, to its credit, responded with commendable speed, denouncing the practice as "wholly inappropriate" and mandating its immediate correction. This episode strikes at the core of a foundational bargain between the courts and citizens: that true justice must not only be done, but must be unmistakably and undeniably seen to be done.

For years, China has consistently championed judicial transparency as the nonnegotiable cornerstone of legal reform. The celebrated launch of China Judgments Online, the official website established by the top court to disclose verdicts, was a bold pledge of openness, a promise to let the disinfecting power of sunlight flood the halls of justice. This was powerfully reinforced by live-trial broadcasts and the strategic publication of landmark cases — all orchestrated to build public trust through unwavering visibility.

The guiding principle is clear: transparency is the rule, the expectation. Secrecy is a narrowly defined, legally constrained exception reserved for protecting State secrets or shielding the vulnerable, such as victims of domestic abuse or minors.

Yet, the redaction of judges' names represents a self-inflicted wound to this very principle. A judge's signature on a ruling is not a trivial formality; it is a responsibility toward litigants and the public.

In the public eye, this act of anonymization can feel eerily like justice operating behind a veil, fostering suspicion where there should be trust, and inviting speculation about fragility where there should be an image of unshakable strength.

Contrast this with the exemplary handling of the disturbing case involving a man surnamed Mu, who mentally abused his ex-girlfriend. It was highlighted by the top court in November as a landmark ruling that confirms humiliation and degrading treatment of family members as forms of domestic violence.

In the release of that case, the top court balanced necessary privacy with crucial transparency. While protecting the identity of the victim, it laid bare brutal facts of psychological manipulation, the rigorous legal logic applied, and the broader societal message, clarifying that domestic violence "is not limited to physical abuse such as hitting", and that Mu's sustained humiliation and demeaning behavior toward a family member amounted to psychological violence.

That was transparency executed with confidence and purpose. The name-redaction scandal feels like just the opposite — a needless retreat into the shadows. The top court's corrective order is a vital first step. But this incident cannot be dismissed as a one-off flaw. It follows a pattern of awkward stumbling in the march toward transparency.

Ultimately, the authority of the judiciary is built day by day, verdict by verdict. That in turn builds public confidence. For justice to be truly credible, its architects must stand in the full glare of accountability. The promise of "open justice" demands nothing less than courageous, consistent, and complete visibility — starting with the clear, proud signature of every judge on every public judgment they write.

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 26uuu亚洲国产精品 | 日本免费一区二区三区 | 国产精品xxxx | 欧美xxxx网站 | 亚洲日日骚 | 日韩欧美在线视频观看 | 日本综合久久 | 在线免费观看毛片 | 在线观看成人免费视频 | av中文网站| 日本国产高清 | 午夜视频入口 | 麻豆91精品91久久久 | 中国黄色三级 | 国产精品一区在线播放 | 午夜爽视频 | 超碰五月 | 久久高清 | 久久精品系列 | 国外成人在线视频 | 国产精品久久久久久久久动漫 | 久久久午夜精品 | 激情视频一区二区三区 | 在线观看aa| 国产精品69毛片高清亚洲 | 日本成人黄色片 | 蜜臀av网站 | 麻豆性视频 | 中文字幕在线观 | 亚洲一区二区三区四区av | 天堂中文在线资 | 玩偶姐姐在线观看免费 | 在线网站你懂的 | 综合网天天 | 黄色短视频免费看 | 狠狠操在线| 911精品| 在线看日韩av | 久久免费在线观看视频 | 亚洲国产精品综合 | 成人观看网站 |