日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Chinese Perspectives

Greenland reveals cracks in transatlantic relations

By Wang Chong | China Daily | Updated: 2026-01-30 20:36
Share
Share - WeChat

Whether the United States could seize Greenland has become the focus of international attention in recent weeks. What might appear as a bilateral dispute between Washington and Copenhagen is in reality a test case for NATO, transatlantic relations and the international order.

Under mounting pressure from the US administration, some European nations have begun to demonstrate political resolve with security implications. Some European countries, including the United Kingdom and France, deployed a small contingent of military personnel in Greenland, signaling their support for Denmark in safeguarding the island. Although limited in scale, this move carries enormous political and strategic significance. It reflects the profound impact the dispute over Greenland could exert on the geopolitical landscape and the broader international situation.

From the security perspective, the parallel deployment of US and European forces in Greenland raises concerns of a rift emerging within NATO. The troops dispatched by the European countries have been officially framed as assisting Washington in "safeguarding" Greenland, echoing US President Donald Trump's assertion that the region faces security threats from Russia. Ostensibly, the deployments are a diplomatic courtesy in support of the US stance. However, the underlying message is clear. European nations have signaled that they will support Denmark in defending its autonomous Greenland.

If the military presence of the US and European countries over the Greenland issue escalates, the internal dynamics within NATO would shift beyond policy disagreements toward direct confrontation among its member states. Once NATO descends into internal strife, even if its institutional framework does not immediately collapse, its substantive function and political authority as a collective defense organization would be severely undermined. The grouping would be potentially reduced to a nominal entity.

Beyond NATO, the Greenland issue poses a challenge to transatlantic relations. After World War II, the US and Europe have maintained a high degree of alignment on so-called shared values, alliance-building and major global issues, generally coordinating their positions in international affairs. Even though Europe was dissatisfied during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the early 2000s, the discontent was directed more at the US administration than at the country itself.

However, the dispute over Greenland has brought US-Europe contradictions into the open, with disagreements even extending to the realm of values. For instance, during a visit to Europe, US Vice-President JD Vance publicly criticized Germany and other European countries for not respecting freedom of speech and expressed Washington's dissatisfaction. Such divisions indicate that transatlantic relations are challenged not only by frictions in policy coordination but also by deeper divergences in their fundamental approaches. They indicate that the transatlantic alliance is far from robust.

In a broader context, internal divisions within the transatlantic alliance signal fragmentation across the West. If this trend continues, its structural consequences could mirror the historical split of the Roman Empire into Eastern and Western halves. This analogy highlights a systemic fracture in authority and order in the West, with spillover effects that could directly and negatively impact the current international system.

Since the end of World War II, the international community has gradually established a consensus centered on respecting the United Nations Charter, adhering to international law and safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity. This institutional framework has contributed to a relatively enduring global peace and stability in the past eight decades.

However, the stance adopted by the US administration on the Greenland issue challenges this consensus. By prioritizing transactional logic, Washington's approach is to take whatever it wants. It disregards even a symbolic respect for international law and reveals a more overt imperialist tendency. Such a shift poses significant risks to global peace and stability.

This is why the dispute over Greenland extends far beyond bilateral tensions between the US and Denmark. At a deeper level, it reflects strategic divergences between Washington and Brussels, highlights structural contradictions within NATO, and poses a serious challenge to the current system of international law and the international order embodied by the UN Charter.

The author is the director of the American Studies Center at Zhejiang International Studies University.

The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天摸夜夜| 免费欧美日韩 | 三级黄色短视频 | 91高清在线视频 | 欧美日韩亚洲色图 | 神马九九| 午夜免费福利在线观看 | 欧洲天堂网| 欧美专区在线视频 | 黄色大片网站在线观看 | 中文在线a√在线8 | 欧美影视一区二区三区 | 国产原创视频在线观看 | 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看 | 青娱乐av | 新国产视频 | 欧美福利在线视频 | 国产成人精品一区二区三区视频 | 国产精品久久久久桃色tv | 正在播放一区二区 | 久久免费少妇高潮久久精品99 | 亚洲aaa| 亚洲天堂成人在线观看 | 欧美一级免费大片 | 中文字幕av免费 | 久久久久久国产 | 在线视频天堂 | 怡红院av在线 | 黄页网站免费在线观看 | 免费成人深夜天涯网站 | 五级 黄 色 片 | 国产一区二区视频在线免费观看 | 女女综合网 | 麻豆久久久久 | 欧美日韩四区 | 能看黄色的网站 | 日本色综合 | 中文在线资源天堂 | 欧美a在线观看 | 免费观看黄色大片 | 亚洲高清在线 |