|
|
Home
> Opinions
|
Take the global imbalance seriouslyBy Zhu Qiwen (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-09-21 07:55
If global leaders are to make the coming G20 summit in Pittsburgh an effective response to the global financial and economic crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers a year ago, they should whole-heartedly take to the table the issue of balancing the world economy. Though the strong rebound in China and emerging "green shoots" in major developed countries have apparently prevented the world economy from falling off the brink for the moment, policymakers cannot afford to just tinker at the edges of an outdated global financial and economic system. Without addressing global imbalances immediately, the current recovery will be neither solid nor sustainable. However, media reports show that Western countries are still using the issue of global imbalance merely as a red herring. Worse, by paying only lip service to their promise of opposing protectionism, they are actually discouraging necessary domestic industrial restructuring as part of the global efforts to restore balance to the world economy. It was reported last week that the United States and European nations tried to hammer out a framework for tackling global imbalances to be agreed upon in Pittsburgh. At the first glance, that sounds good news for the world economy since coordinated efforts to reduce global imbalances will underpin the recovery from recession and ensure that the future pattern of global growth is more sustainable. Yet, by interpreting global imbalances as "big gaps between savings and investment rates among countries, reflected in big current account surpluses and deficits", they revealed a lack of sincerity to fix the long-term problems in the global financial and economic system. Clearly, some people in the West still consider a savings glut from surplus nations as the main culprit of the global crisis. But such self-justification goes against the grain of both trade history and the ongoing course of globalization. As long as international trade had bridged economies from different parts of the globe many centuries ago, trade surpluses for some countries and trade deficits for some others have become the norm instead of a balanced current account for everyone. Historically speaking, it makes no sense to blame one country's trade surplus gained through fair competition, the conditions for fair competition being secured against great odds. The ongoing globalization, characterized by unprecedented labor division and specification, has brought the world economy in recent years to a new phase that witnessed rapid accumulation of trade surpluses in some manufacturing and resource-rich countries, and a surge of current account deficits in consumer-centerd economies. If world leaders recognize that globalization, as a whole, has increased and will continue to add to consumer welfare and productivity, they must then understand that the current global imbalances will be not reduced significantly before trade-deficit countries can adjust their own economic structures in line with the global demand to bring their current account in the black. To be serious about global imbalances means that G20 leaders should agree on a realistic approach to cut rich countries' trade deficits. Given the comparative advantages China enjoys, it is only natural that the country will continue to excel in trade of manufacturing goods no matter how well its domestic consumption is boosted. Hence, blaming China's trade surplus as a synonym, or even a symbol, of "global economic imbalances" will not help towards fixing the problem. Instead, developed countries should help their high-tech and service sectors to seize the opportunity that China offers for pursuing greener growth and expanding domestic consumption. To that end, developed countries need to not only adjust their trade policies but also overhaul their financial systems. Slapping protectionist duties on imports from China only hinders industrial restructuring in related countries to slow the pace of a global recovery. G20 leaders must stand up to rising protectionism for tackling the global imbalance. Established in 1945 under the UN Charter, the General Assembly (GA) occupies a central position as the chief deliberative, policymaking and representative organ of the UN.
In the past few years while adhering to the Scientific Outlook on Development Hu promotes, China has been working towards rigorous targets - which it had set for itself - to promote clean energy, push for energy efficiency and cut greenhouse emissions.
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕视频二区 | 久久国产香蕉 | 91精品久久久久久综合五月天 | 黄色的视频网站 | 91国产视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产一区二区三区 | 五月婷婷综合网 | 五月天婷婷在线视频 | av在线你懂的 | 欧美一区二区三区四区五区六区 | 日本在线视频一区 | av综合在线观看 | 极品少妇xxxx精品少妇偷拍 | 亚洲色图 校园春色 | 日韩国产成人 | 国产伦理久久精品久久久久 | 中国男女全黄大片 | 日韩特黄一级片 | 日韩国产成人 | 免费日韩在线 | 成人一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人在线观看 | 欧美在线国产 | 亚洲男人皇宫 | 一级片国产 | 欧美最猛黑人xxxx黑人猛交 | 二区三区在线观看 | 日韩在线免费观看视频 | 欧美顶级黄色大片免费 | 日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产成人免费观看视频 | 免费av毛片 | 视频大全在线观看网址 | 九九热精彩视频 | 天堂在线www | 亚洲精品播放 | 亚洲男人天堂 | 国产免费91 | 污片免费在线观看 | 一区二区三区在线播放 | 日韩特黄一级片 |